At times it is very difficult to avoid sharing what some people search on when they surf into this site.
Take for example today's search string, "can people having telepathy in conversation "
The more pertinent question is, "Do you really want to hear someone else's voice in your head?"
I know that unless I am madly in Love with them, I don't; and, even then, I would think twice about how often I would forgive the intrusion.
Basically, for a large swathe of our society all you are going to find going on in their heads is, "what are we eating?" "where is the nearest restroom?" or "when do I get laid next?"; and not necessarily in that pecking order; oh, and let's not forget "did I just miss the off ramp?"
Good thing someOne put some colorful stones to good use nearly 2 decades ago to filter all that out, so we needn't be bothered with such minutiae.
And the laic may think there is little to no harm in listening in on someone else's private deliberations, but what they don't understand is that it's a holistic experience and unless you are willing to share their feelings (not just emotions, but sensations, too), best to keep such things out of reach of children.
Even a short-lived exposure to such an experience makes the most enured among us, that would be Me, want to blow their brains out on a daily basis.
So, I hope whomever was responsible for it would have just as much fun with it : (
As an afterthought, if the search string was actually a perjorative 'can people' having telephathic conversations, then that would explain why after they already killed us off, they no longer can see Us, especially this One Big Fat Momma.
Showing posts with label Telepathy Experiment. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Telepathy Experiment. Show all posts
Tuesday, March 15, 2011
Monday, August 13, 2007
Telepathy And Technology
Telepathy, remote viewing, movies projected against the sky, and specifically targeted auditory messages are only some of the events that occur in Maxie Time, a diary of a purported involuntary experiment on a human subject.
If one were to report seeing holographic movies projected against the day sky in 1997, the common person on the street would not think it possible. The professed medical professional would deem one ‘crazy’ and that would be the end of the discussion. Yet, since 2003 a San Francisco-based company IO2Technology patented just such a process by which images from a number of sources, including televisions or computers, may be projected into thin air. Granted this is a small scale version of the sky movie, but the device is currently in the market—called Heliodisplay it retails for about $20,000.
By the same token, back in 1996 or 1997, if one were to ‘hear’ voices that seem to be targeting them and no one nearby is privy to these ‘voices’, the unfortunate observer would be marginalized as schizophrenic, manic or suffering from some other mental instability. Yet, again, since the early 2000’s, any kid with some savvy can download these ‘invisible’ auditory ‘hallucinations’ as ringtones specifically targeting certain age groups, because it turns out, hearing range varies based on a person’s age. Suddenly, it doesn’t seem so improbable to narrow the sound wave and precisely hone its direction to pinpoint a target as well. While this misunderstanding may appear comical, it is very tragic to the subject being marginalized as crazy just for having the misfortune of detecting such a specific sound at a time when the technology was not common knowledge.
If by now there are reasonable explanations for the extraordinary experiences described in Maxie Time, then can the assertion the author makes, that the government is actively conducting synthetic telepathy and remote viewing involuntary human experiments on the general population, be too far fetched? The book is written as a diary and carefully avoids common conspiracy theory pitfalls because the parties involved in this undertaking appear to be operating without subterfuge and with no fear of the law. It seems even the doctors are in on it.
What about the law? Since 1993 there have been several attempts made by the US Senate to propose legislation to prevent conducting involuntary human experiments without the subject’s informed consent, none of which have been ratified. This begs the question, if such involuntary experiments are not ongoing, why the need for such legislation? And is it ever likely such protections can be put into place considering the fallout this would have by giving past victims the legal standing to pursue restitution?
If one were to report seeing holographic movies projected against the day sky in 1997, the common person on the street would not think it possible. The professed medical professional would deem one ‘crazy’ and that would be the end of the discussion. Yet, since 2003 a San Francisco-based company IO2Technology patented just such a process by which images from a number of sources, including televisions or computers, may be projected into thin air. Granted this is a small scale version of the sky movie, but the device is currently in the market—called Heliodisplay it retails for about $20,000.
By the same token, back in 1996 or 1997, if one were to ‘hear’ voices that seem to be targeting them and no one nearby is privy to these ‘voices’, the unfortunate observer would be marginalized as schizophrenic, manic or suffering from some other mental instability. Yet, again, since the early 2000’s, any kid with some savvy can download these ‘invisible’ auditory ‘hallucinations’ as ringtones specifically targeting certain age groups, because it turns out, hearing range varies based on a person’s age. Suddenly, it doesn’t seem so improbable to narrow the sound wave and precisely hone its direction to pinpoint a target as well. While this misunderstanding may appear comical, it is very tragic to the subject being marginalized as crazy just for having the misfortune of detecting such a specific sound at a time when the technology was not common knowledge.
If by now there are reasonable explanations for the extraordinary experiences described in Maxie Time, then can the assertion the author makes, that the government is actively conducting synthetic telepathy and remote viewing involuntary human experiments on the general population, be too far fetched? The book is written as a diary and carefully avoids common conspiracy theory pitfalls because the parties involved in this undertaking appear to be operating without subterfuge and with no fear of the law. It seems even the doctors are in on it.
What about the law? Since 1993 there have been several attempts made by the US Senate to propose legislation to prevent conducting involuntary human experiments without the subject’s informed consent, none of which have been ratified. This begs the question, if such involuntary experiments are not ongoing, why the need for such legislation? And is it ever likely such protections can be put into place considering the fallout this would have by giving past victims the legal standing to pursue restitution?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
